EQUIPMENT BUYER GUIDE · Filling
Syntegon ALF 5000 and FLC 3000 Vial Liquid Filling Machines
Syntegon's vial liquid-filling range centres on two machines. The ALF 5000 fills vials from 2 to 500 ml and ampoules from 1 to 30 ml, with 100% in-process control on vials. The FLC 3000 fills vials from 2 to 500 ml and uses statistical in-process control. Syntegon lists both at up to 600 containers per minute with up to 12 filling heads and RABS or isolator integration. They suit pharmaceutical producers filling liquids into glass vials. Send container drawings, dose range and batch plan to get a configured offer.
Build your inquiry checklistExplore this equipment
Published specifications
These are the manufacturer's published values. Confirm them for your product and configuration before ordering.
- Packaging format
- bottle (manufacturer stated)
- Product to pack
- liquid (manufacturer stated)
- Maximum rated output
- 600 packs/min (manufacturer stated)
ALF 5000 and FLC 3000 in brief
The ALF 5000 and FLC 3000 are Syntegon's named liquid fillers for vials. Each is listed at 600 containers per minute, with up to 12 filling heads and a choice of RABS or isolator. The ALF 5000 handles vials of 2–500 ml plus ampoules of 1–30 ml and checks the fill of every vial. The FLC 3000 is a vial machine for 2–500 ml with statistical fill checking and a modular layout. Pick ALF when ampoules are part of the job; pick FLC for vial-only work.
Who supplies the machine
Syntegon publishes the model comparison on its global vial-filling page. [1] The Hangzhou company lists vial, ampoule, pre-filled syringe and capsule filling, together with isolator, inspection, qualification, validation and service work. [2]
Because the comparison comes from the group page, ask who will contract, build, integrate, test and support your line. Ask too whether the machine would come from Hangzhou stock or from another group site, and whether one contract covers it all.
Decide the scope first: vials only, vials and ampoules, or a line that feeds freeze-drying. Send container drawings and dosage requirements before discussing how many filling heads you need. The pumping system, barrier set-up and batch strategy follow from your product and plan.
Model comparison
Syntegon's comparison, read on 11 October 2026, gives the figures below. All of them vary with configuration. [1]
Swipe or scroll the table to compare all columns.
| Point | ALF 5000 | FLC 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Listed output | 600 containers/min, 100% IPC on vials | 600 containers/min, statistical IPC |
| Format range | Vials 2–500 ml, ampoules 1–30 ml | Vials 2–500 ml |
| Containers | Vials, moulded glass, ampoules | Vials, moulded glass |
| Filling heads | Up to 12 | Up to 12 |
| Handling and changeover | Gentle transport, fast tool-free changeover | Gentle vial transport, few parts, modular layout |
| Barrier and integration | RABS or isolator, lyophilization option | RABS or isolator integration |
The 600 figure is a top rate. Your rate will depend on fill volume, liquid, head count and inspection set-up. "Up to 12" is a maximum too, so ask how many heads the offer includes. Have Syntegon tie output, format, dosing system and in-process control to one quoted configuration.
The table points to a first split. Look at ALF when you must run ampoules alongside vials. Look at FLC for vial work and its layout options. If ampoules are in scope, plan the carton stage as well: Beili's ampoule cartoner takes injections already placed in trays or blisters, so you need a tray-loading step between filler and cartoner. Settle technical fit and the knock-on effects on the whole line before you compare prices.
In-process control and inspection
Syntegon's comparison lists 100% in-process control for vials on the ALF entry and statistical IPC on the FLC entry. Ask what is measured, at which point, what happens to a failing container, and whether the system stores each result or only sampled results. Keep the quoted wording, statistical or 100%, exactly as offered in your specification. [1]
Fill control, visual inspection and container-closure integrity testing each answer a separate question. Syntegon's page covers particle and cosmetic inspection, leak detection and empty-vial checks as parts of a line. Ask which of these come with the base filler and which appear in your quotation as extra stations. [1]
Swipe or scroll the table to compare all columns.
| What you need to know | Ask Syntegon for | Common mix-up |
|---|---|---|
| Is the fill quantity right? | The dosing acceptance method and the IPC scope offered | Expecting every container to get every quality test |
| Are visible defects caught? | Inspection stages, defect list and challenge plan | Expecting a filler to include an inspection machine |
| Does the closure suit the product? | Closure process and who runs integrity tests | Taking a visually accepted vial as a sealed one |
| Can the site use the records? | Data fields, user roles, exports and test documents | Reading general digital-services text as your control specification |
Your technical and quality teams should work through these questions with Syntegon and sign off the inspection protocol themselves.
The full vial line
Syntegon describes a line that runs from formulation and pure media through vial pretreatment, filling and closing, freeze-drying, barriers, inspection and sterilization. Choose the stages your process needs. Each one is quoted as its own scope and price item. [1]
Draw the boundary for the proposal. Show the incoming vial condition, the product feed point, stopper and cap supply, the filling and closing stages, any transfer to freeze-drying, and the state of containers passed to inspection. Mark each supplier's scope and your utilities and building connections. A drawing like this keeps a mechanically complete filler from being mistaken for a commissioned line.
Syntegon offers several filling methods: rotary-valve piston, time-pressure, peristaltic, mass-flow and rolling-diaphragm pumps, with multi-use or single-use fluid paths. Ask which method Syntegon proposes for your formulation and why. Ask for trial results on representative product or an agreed test medium. [1]
Vial volume alone is a weak basis for choosing. Discuss dose range, viscosity, foaming, product sensitivity, batch size, the product-contact path and changeover needs. Ask Syntegon to state filling accuracy, allowable product hold time and cleaning results for your formulation as written answers in the offer.
Barrier and validation scope
Both machines list RABS or isolator integration. Zhongya's DABL bottle line follows another aseptic route: it sterilizes plastic bottles and caps with dry H2O2 for liquid foods, so its barrier questions differ from a vial filler's. Syntegon's page uses Annex 1 and GMP wording and describes CIP/SIP capability and optional filter-test arrangements. [1]
Request the exact barrier arrangement offered, the operator-access concept, the intervention scope, cleaning and decontamination duties and the interface documents. Your qualified quality and engineering staff should set the requirements, validation deliverables and process setpoints for your product.
The Hangzhou page lists qualification and validation among its services. Confirm the contracted services, documents, languages, acceptance milestones and who is responsible for each site-specific qualification task. [2]
Output, batches and changeover
On short batches with frequent changes, preparation, line clearance and changeover often limit output more than the running speed does. Ask for separate times for format change, product-path change, cleaning and restart to accepted production. Syntegon describes fast tool-free changeover on the ALF and a few-part modular design on the FLC, without one changeover time for all formats. [1]
As a rough planning figure, 600 containers/min for 60 minutes without a stop comes to 36,000 containers through the machine. Released doses will be fewer. Accepted output depends on how units are counted, operating time, rejects and downstream limits.
Compare offers on the same batch plan and the same counting rule. Record units accepted on the first pass separately from units recovered after rework, so repeated first-time rejects stay visible. Ask how the trial will log interventions, stoppages and the agreed inspection scope.
Confirm before ordering
Ask Syntegon to put these in writing: project price, lead time, service response in your country, filling accuracy for your liquid, utility consumption, full installation footprint, software deliverables, the change-part list and the manufacturing site for the configuration offered. Syntegon's customer case studies describe particular projects. Ask for references with a product and container close to yours, and base your expectations on the configuration proposal and acceptance agreement.
Inquiry checklist
Buyer questions
Is the ALF 5000 the better machine because it has 100% IPC?
Not automatically. The right choice depends on product, container, batch plan, inspection strategy and the configuration you contract. Use the IPC difference as a concrete question for Syntegon. [1]
Are the ALF and FLC machines made in Hangzhou?
The Hangzhou page lists the local portfolio and services. Ask Syntegon to name the manufacturing site and the company responsible for supply of your machine. [2]
Does a compliant-line headline cover my validation work?
No. Agree a documentation and verification scope with Syntegon and have your own specialists approve it for site acceptance.
Sources and verification
[1] Syntegon official vial filling machines portfolio
Read 11 October 2026. ALF 5000 and FLC 3000 comparison, filling methods and line-integration options.
[2] Syntegon official Hangzhou location profile
Read 11 October 2026. Hangzhou portfolio and service categories.
BEFORE YOU REQUEST A QUOTE
Your inquiry checklist
Select the questions that match your project. Copy them into your specification or prepare a sourcing brief. Selections stay on this page and reset on reload; no inquiry is sent by selecting or copying.
Source or specification changed? Send PackagingEquip a correction with the product name, the statement and a supporting source.